Tag Archives: remora

3 Responses to QRD, Small Art, Myspace, Thorn1, Remora

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   February 28, 2011 at 2:19 pm

   i think you need a Gocco Kit.

   we did our latest covers with one…..

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gocco
   • Brian John Mitchell says:

     February 28, 2011 at 2:30 pm

     I think about doing something with woodcuts on a regular basis. I don’t know. I kinda like things to look super pro sometimes & kinda primitive other times.
     • GoddakkAttack says:

       February 28, 2011 at 2:52 pm

       w/ Gocco you can do both.

One Response to Small Art, Small Life Form, Remora, Weather Machine, Dreamland, Photo Frame, What It Is, Postal Scale, Low Frequency Microphone, 15 Year Show

1. GoddakkATTACK says:

   February 26, 2011 at 7:52 pm

   after reading the What it is…..i guess the general consensus of the panel was to give it up you’re not going to make it as a musician/in the music biz.

2 Responses to Crappy Camera, Remora Mastering, QRD, Dream

1. Nick Marino says:

   February 16, 2011 at 12:06 pm

   those QRD questions were definitely hard to answer here and there. i still have to edit mine. there were so many questions!!!!
   • Brian John Mitchell says:

     February 16, 2011 at 3:26 pm

     I don’t think it was the quantity of questions as much as the quality. I feel like if someone reads my interview, they walk away having no more of an idea of what my comics are about than before they read it. I think I haven’t had any indepth conversations about comics other than marketing ones & it shows compared to the guitarist or label owner series. But I suppose part of it to is that this series is going after a lot of different folks (some write, some draw, some do it all) & it makes it a bit harder than if it was all artists or authors. You can’t really ask writers about what kind of ink they use….

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.

3 Responses to Sarah June, Optical Feedback, Rollerball, Remora, Worms

1. goddakkattack says:

   January 11, 2011 at 9:05 am

   we had our next rekkid mastered for under 500 and it was way better than if james did it and overall better than it sounded without mastering by a long shot the plumerai one that is not the goddakk
2. Brian John Mitchell says:

   January 11, 2011 at 4:41 pm

   I think I’ve gotten about six or seven records mastered at the $300 price point & while they are better than if nothing had been done at all, I’m not convinced they’re better than since I started mastering stuff myself a few years ago.

   I assumed you’d run your own mastering on the new Goddakk, get me the files in an uncompressed format & I’ll put a little Silber polish on it….
3. goddakkattack says:

   January 11, 2011 at 7:06 pm

   uhave to research places without price being the criteria most places are willing to cut a reasonable deal

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.

2 Responses to Remora, Phone Reviewers, Wolverine, Thorn1, Web Work, Games, Tariffs

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   December 31, 2010 at 10:48 am

   doesn’t that already exist:

   THE AUDIO HOME RECORDING ACT OF 1992:
   The AHRA provides that the importer, manufacturer, or distributor of any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording media must file quarterly statements and pay, with those filings, royalties on each recorder or piece of media distributed in the United States. The royalty is 2 percent of the manufacturer’s selling price for recorders and 3 percent of the manufacturer’s selling price for recordable media. The royalty minimum for recorders is one dollar and the maximum is eight dollars, although in 1998, interested parties (such as musicians and music publishers) may request an increase in the royalty maximum under certain conditions. There are no minimum or maximum royalties for recording media.

   Two-thirds of the royalties go into the Sound Recording Fund and are distributed from that fund to the American Federation of Musicians (2-5Ú8 percent), the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (1-3Ú8 percent); 40 percent of the remaining royalties go to featured recording artists and 60 percent are distributed to music publishers.

   The remaining third of the royalties are allocated to the Musical Works Fund and are distributed evenly between music publishers and songwriters. The percentages of distribution within each group of beneficiaries is determined by the groups themselves.
   • Brian John Mitchell says:

     December 31, 2010 at 11:10 am

     Here’s the thing with that (from Wiki):
     Blank music CDs and recorders

     17 U.S.C. § 1008 bars copyright infringement action and 17 U.S.C. § 1003 provides for a royalty of 3% of the initial transfer price. The royalty rate in 17 U.S.C. § 1004 was established by the Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998. This only applies to CDs which are labeled and sold for music use; they do not apply to blank computer CDs, even though they can be (and often are) used to record or “burn” music from the computer to CD. A similar royalty applies to stand-alone CD recorders, but not to CD burners used with computers.

     Thanks to a precedent established in a 1998 lawsuit involving the Rio PMP300 player, MP3 players are deemed “computer peripherals” and are not subject to a royalty of this type in the U.S.

Comments are closed.