Tag Archives: Thorn1

Comments are closed.

2 Responses to Software, Free Comp, Coupling, Flash, Dreams

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   September 4, 2011 at 8:23 am

   i was at james’s place and was watching the same thing.

   also when i was watchin less than zero i realize i was wearing the same shirt as the main character (not downey jr) and this was earlier this year and that was wayback machine
2. Brian John Mitchell says:

   September 4, 2011 at 2:16 pm

   Wait, there really was an interview with Hetfield where he was wearing my shirt?

2 Responses to Digital Distro, If Thousands, Thorn1

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   August 3, 2011 at 7:34 am

   aren’t all of these only paying you for plays whereas itunes and amazon pays you for a purchase of an mp3? cents vs. fraction of cents. per song. it’s more like collecting royalteees vs. sales sorta kinda.
2. Brian John Mitchell says:

   August 3, 2011 at 10:46 am

   Conceptually it’s like sales versus royalty except that the model for Spotify negates the idea of sales in the future if it gains enough users & popularity. Which would bring digital sales (1/3 of income for the past 5 years) down to the amount of selling two or three CDs. So I suppose that’s why a lot of folks are selecting to not put their whole catalog on Spotify (& Last FM & Grooveshark & GimmeSound for that matter).

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.

3 Responses to QRD, Small Art, Myspace, Thorn1, Remora

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   February 28, 2011 at 2:19 pm

   i think you need a Gocco Kit.

   we did our latest covers with one…..

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gocco
   • Brian John Mitchell says:

     February 28, 2011 at 2:30 pm

     I think about doing something with woodcuts on a regular basis. I don’t know. I kinda like things to look super pro sometimes & kinda primitive other times.
     • GoddakkAttack says:

       February 28, 2011 at 2:52 pm

       w/ Gocco you can do both.

Comments are closed.

2 Responses to Remora, Phone Reviewers, Wolverine, Thorn1, Web Work, Games, Tariffs

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   December 31, 2010 at 10:48 am

   doesn’t that already exist:

   THE AUDIO HOME RECORDING ACT OF 1992:
   The AHRA provides that the importer, manufacturer, or distributor of any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording media must file quarterly statements and pay, with those filings, royalties on each recorder or piece of media distributed in the United States. The royalty is 2 percent of the manufacturer’s selling price for recorders and 3 percent of the manufacturer’s selling price for recordable media. The royalty minimum for recorders is one dollar and the maximum is eight dollars, although in 1998, interested parties (such as musicians and music publishers) may request an increase in the royalty maximum under certain conditions. There are no minimum or maximum royalties for recording media.

   Two-thirds of the royalties go into the Sound Recording Fund and are distributed from that fund to the American Federation of Musicians (2-5Ú8 percent), the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (1-3Ú8 percent); 40 percent of the remaining royalties go to featured recording artists and 60 percent are distributed to music publishers.

   The remaining third of the royalties are allocated to the Musical Works Fund and are distributed evenly between music publishers and songwriters. The percentages of distribution within each group of beneficiaries is determined by the groups themselves.
   • Brian John Mitchell says:

     December 31, 2010 at 11:10 am

     Here’s the thing with that (from Wiki):
     Blank music CDs and recorders

     17 U.S.C. § 1008 bars copyright infringement action and 17 U.S.C. § 1003 provides for a royalty of 3% of the initial transfer price. The royalty rate in 17 U.S.C. § 1004 was established by the Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998. This only applies to CDs which are labeled and sold for music use; they do not apply to blank computer CDs, even though they can be (and often are) used to record or “burn” music from the computer to CD. A similar royalty applies to stand-alone CD recorders, but not to CD burners used with computers.

     Thanks to a precedent established in a 1998 lawsuit involving the Rio PMP300 player, MP3 players are deemed “computer peripherals” and are not subject to a royalty of this type in the U.S.

Comments are closed.

5 Responses to Canada (C-32), Smartphones, Thorn1, Just A Man, SLF Video, Vigilant

1. GoddakkAttack says:

   December 22, 2010 at 9:54 am

   if you ever took a look at he android app market and then compared to the iphone one. this could answer that question of marketshare.
   • Brian John Mitchell says:

     December 22, 2010 at 12:29 pm

     I probably wouldn’t understand it anyway because I don’t really play video games & I don’t feel a great need to have a phone that makes light saber noises when I swing it around. I don’t know. I might pay $1 for a set of vocal exercises, but I guess in reality that would just be buying an MP3? I don’t really know how technology works.
     • GoddakkAttack says:

       December 22, 2010 at 12:55 pm

       well i think that’s the problem..most android apps are basically hey let’s play pacman whereas there are a bunch more actual useful apps for the iphone. also your not being aware that the smartphone isn’t just for playing games may be part of your not understanding the appeal but i do think that most people that have them aren’t using them for much more than that anyways so there you go.
2. Leanne says:

   January 11, 2011 at 10:27 am

   The term of copyright in Canada is NOT 50 years from creation. Rather, it is 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the author dies (see section 6 of the Canadian Copyright Act). This is essentially life plus 50 years. So Neil Young need not worry.
3. Brian John Mitchell says:

   January 11, 2011 at 4:44 pm

   Thanks Leanne. I must’ve been looking at one of the older laws in the copyright history. Sometimes hard to keep them straight….